News & Reviews News Wire News Wire Top 10: No. 9 (tie), the STB and Wall Street

News Wire Top 10: No. 9 (tie), the STB and Wall Street

By Bill Stephens | December 24, 2021

Board Chairman remains critical of operating impact from investor demands

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from brands. Sign-up for email today!

man in suit speaking
Surface Transportation Board Chairman Martin Oberman addresses the Midwest Association of Rail Shippers meeting in July 2021. (Trains: David Lassen)

Surface Transportation Board Chairman Martin J. Oberman ended 2021 the way he began it: By criticizing Wall Street’s influence on the publicly traded Class I railroads.

Oberman addressed several shipper and rail industry conferences during the year and sharpened his message each time he spoke. Wall Street’s demands for lower operating ratios have prompted railroads to seek only the most profitable traffic, he contends, which has stunted growth and sent rail traffic to the highway over the past 15 years.

“The Class I [railroads] have become almost completely shareholder-centric in their business philosophy, and actual operations and have long ceased being customer-centric,” Oberman told theRailTrends conference in November.

Railroads talk about growth and service improvements that make them better competitors against trucks, Oberman says. “The railroads’ emphasis has not been on growth,” he told the North American Rail Shippers in September. “Rather the emphasis has been on cutting in pursuit of the almighty [operating ratio] down to below 60%.”

To satisfy Wall Street demands for lower operating ratios, or O.R.s, the Class I railroads have cut their workforces by 25% over the past five years, which Oberman says makes it difficult to provide more reliable service and recover from disruptions like extreme weather events. It’s also led to railroads demarketing certain types of traffic, he contends.

“It is clear that as a whole, railroads have foregone many kinds of carloads that they could carry profitably, only not at O.R.s as low as 55%, and instead have focused only on the most profitable traffic,” Oberman says. “No one is asking the railroads to focus on traffic that would only be carried at a loss. But surely it is not asking too much for railroads to actively seek profitable traffic, even if not as profitable as others.”

Oberman says Wall Street’s influence has put shareholder interests above those of other key railroad stakeholders, including customers, employees, and the public. And he was critical of railroad stock buyback programs and dividends that have put more money in shareholders’ pockets than into maintaining and expanding the rail network.

While Oberman was using his position as a bully pulpit, the STB has taken up regulatory reforms that the rail industry opposes. Among them: Reciprocal switching, making it easier for shippers to challenge rates, re-regulating certain rail-hauled commodities, and considering whether railroads should provide the board with service metrics for local service.

The Association of American Railroads has pushed back against Oberman’s comments. Excluding coal, rail ton-miles are up over the past 15 years, AAR CEO Ian Jefferies wrote. Jefferies defended the industry’s capital spending, which has averaged nearly 19% of revenue over the past decade – or six times higher than the manufacturing industry’s average. He also said Class I railroad share buyback and dividend programs struck a balance between the industry’s reinvestment needs and providing the returns that shareholders demand.

Additional News Wire reading:

“STB chairman questions level of rail competition, Wall Street influence …,” July 13, 2021.

“Top regulator urges railroads to focus on growth,” Sept. 9, 2021.

“AAR challenges points made in STB chairman’s speech …,” Oct. 12, 2021.

“The future of the rail industry is up for grabs, consultant says,” Nov. 22, 2021.


News Wire Top 10, the runners up, Dec. 23, 2021.

2 thoughts on “News Wire Top 10: No. 9 (tie), the STB and Wall Street

  1. Isn’t the move of freight traffic from railroads to highways more the fault of governments than the private railroads? We continue to invest vast public sums in our highways. We still do not make trucks pay their full cost. We allow double and triple trailers on our interstate highways. And since we don’t make the emission of carbon expensive, the air quality advantages of rail don’t play into our economy. I don’t like the railroad’s cost cutting and agree with Oberman’s criticism, but it’s a bigger story than just the railroads’ choices.

  2. While my UNP and NSC stock have gone up in value, I worry that it can’t last if they don’t GROW the business. My finger is getting itchy to pull the SELL trigger. Wall Street keeps pushing them to squeeze all they can but seems like they are through the fat and into the bone.

You must login to submit a comment