Trains.com
You have 2 views remaining. Click here to learn about the Unlimited Membership!

Home / News & Reviews / News Wire / CSX, NS call Amtrak request for more Gulf Coast information ‘irrelevant, unhelpful’

CSX, NS call Amtrak request for more Gulf Coast information ‘irrelevant, unhelpful’

By | June 1, 2022

Passenger operator says information would address concerns voiced by STB

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

CSX logo

CSX logoWASHINGTON — Amtrak’s continuing effort to gain access to data relating to freight traffic on the route of its proposed Gulf Coast passenger service has drawn strong protest from CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern.

In a Tuesday filing with the Surface Transportation Board, the two freight railroads urged the board to reject the passenger operator’s motion, saying it would create “severe delay” in the ongoing Gulf Coast proceeding and constitutes “broad, wide-ranging, and irrelevant discovery that is patently unhelpful to the expeditious resolution of this case.”

Norfolk Southern logoAmtrak filed its motion asking the board to require the additional information from the two freight railroads on May 23, shortly after it told the board it opposed a request from the two freight railroads for mediation, in part because CSX and NS indicated they would not share the data in question [see “CSX, NS again ask for mediation …,” Trains News Wire, May 26, 2022]. It argued that it was seeking information that would address concerns voiced by board chairman Martin Oberman during the most recent session in the long-running public hearing on the Gulf Coast case [see “Oberman: Gulf Coast litigants still need to fill in the blanks,” News Wire, May 13, 2022].

In its filing, Amtrak argued that only CSX and NS had information that would allow comparison of the predicted impact of Amtrak service on the Gulf Coast with comparable service elsewhere; information on how freight customer needs are being met; and information needed to assess needed infrastructure improvements on the route.

CSX and NS, in their response, say Amtrak’s request is improper on several procedural terms, but also fails to justify the need for the additional information. The filing “fails to tie any of the expansive requests to the Board’s specific directives,” the railroads argue, and has provided “zero justification for why it did not seek this discovery earlier.” They repeatedly call Amtrak’s request overly broad and burdensome.

The two railroads say that if Amtrak’s request is granted, they would “insist on the opportunity to respond and take additional discovery in kind, taking this case back to square one.”

The hearing is currently scheduled to resume June 13, although CSX and NS have asked for a delay even if their request for mediation is not granted.

6 thoughts on “CSX, NS call Amtrak request for more Gulf Coast information ‘irrelevant, unhelpful’

  1. If it would delay, then CSX and NS is not managing their respective RRs. If they do not know those current figures how can they allocate locos, crews, maintenance, among other parameters?

  2. Isn’t it ironic that NS and CSX accuse AMTRAK of delaying the proceedings when it has been their foot dragging — particularly on the modeling — that has drastically lengthened the process?

  3. I think it’s quite telling that both CSX and NS say the information is irrelevant and unhelpful…yet it’s the very information that Oberman has asked be provided. Perhaps they’re both afraid that it will show 2 passenger trains a day(4 total) will not cause any harm to their existing freight service what so ever.

  4. I hope Mr. Oberman sees this for what it is, another delaying effort. And that he says, Games UP, AMTRAK wins and throws the book at the RR’s. Enough is enough.

  5. Looks to me the only ones benefiting from this whole approval process are the legal teams that are billing by the hour. No customers, passenger or freight are gaining anything. The new train tunnel between New York and New Jersey will probably be completed while this drags on.

You must login to submit a comment