Trains.com
You have 7 views remaining. Click here to learn about the Unlimited Membership!

Home / News & Reviews / News Wire / STB sets new schedule for Amtrak Gulf Coast case

STB sets new schedule for Amtrak Gulf Coast case

By | October 15, 2021

Regulators indicate opposition to further delays

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories and more.

Surface Transportation Board logo

Surface Transportation Board logoWASHINGTON — The Surface Transportation Board has granted a new extension for the process of addressing Amtrak’s request to require CSX and Norfolk Southern to allow passenger service between New Orleans and Mobile, Ala. — while cautioning that it will not look favorably on further efforts to delay the process.

Amtrak filed the request in March, with the goal of starting passenger service on or near Jan. 1, 2022 [see “Amtrak asks STB  to require CSX, NS to allow Gulf Coast service,” Trains News Wire, March 16, 2021], and STB turned down the freight railroads’ request to dismiss the Amtrak effort in August [see “Analysis: STB affirms Amtrak’s right …,” News Wire, Aug. 6, 2021]. The discovery period for the Amtrak application was to end in September, but Administrative Law Judge Thomas McCarthy, who is overseeing discovery matters, extended that deadline to Oct. 4, leading both sides to ask the STB to adjust its schedule.

In a decision released Friday, the board agreed, and set new dates of Nov. 3 for CSX and NS to present opening evidence, Dec. 3 for Amtrak to replace, and Dec. 23 for CSX and NS to provide rebuttal evidence. Proposals on a format for the STB hearing are due Dec. 30.

But the board also made it clear it would like to move forward, writing, “the parties should be aware that any further requests to extend the procedural schedule, even when agreed to, will be scrutinized closely, and they should not assume that further extensions will be routinely granted.”

4 thoughts on “STB sets new schedule for Amtrak Gulf Coast case

  1. The amount of effort spent to get a schedule that is an hour slower than driving and requires 2 sets of equipment to cover the 2 round trips of 272 miles (136 each way) is absurd. Someone should get employee timetables for the CNW Chicago – Milwaukee passenger line (85 miles in 75 – 85 minutes with intermediate stops) to see what is really needed for a competitive service. Amtrak has shown little initiative to getting the 2 Midwest higher speed lines in operation after over 10 years of planning and some implementation. This is a joke.

    1. I don’t know which “2 Midwest higher speed lines” you’re referring to, but three of them are already in operation: Chicago-Milwaukee, Chicago-St. Louis, Chicago-Detroit. Granted, the second two still require improvement, but that’s work in progress, especially now that Amtrak owns a fair bit of the Michigan trackage. And the Hiawatha Service is already 85 miles in 86 minutes, downtown to downtown, with three intermediate stops.

      Also, this wouldn’t require nearly as much effort if the freight railroads quit dicking around and simply allowed things to go back to the effective arrangement they had before Hurricane Katrina.

You must login to submit a comment