Trains.com
You have 7 views remaining.

Home / News & Reviews / News Wire / Amtrak asks STB to compel cooperation by CSX in Gulf Coast case

Amtrak asks STB to compel cooperation by CSX in Gulf Coast case

By David Lassen | October 20, 2021

Freight railroad is “no longer working with Amtrak,” says passenger carrier, which also seeks ruling on participation by Alabama port agency

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories and more.

Crowd greets passenger train
Crowd greets passenger train
Amtrak’s Gulf Coast Inspection train stops at the former Mobile station’s platform on Feb. 18, 2016. Amtrak plans to construct a separate station track in the parking lot at left but says it cannot complete the work before it seeks to start service in early 2022, so it has asked to survey a CSX yard west of the station site. (Bob Johnston)

WASHINGTON — Amtrak has asked the Surface Transportation to take action on two fronts on its pending request for a ruling enabling it to start passenger service between New Orleans and Mobile, Ala. — requesting that the board order CSX and Norfolk Southern to provide access to their properties to prepare for the service, and that it clarify the status of the Alabama State Port Authority regarding the port’s desire to participate in the proceeding.

In a Wednesday filing, Amtrak said it was requesting the interim order for access because “in certain areas, Amtrak is no longer receiving the access to CSX’s rail lines that Amtrak seeks and CSX is no longer working with Amtrak to reach a suitable accommodation.”

Specifically, Amtrak says, CSX is refusing Amtrak’s request to survey the freight railroad’s Choctaw Yard as a possible site for a temporary layover track for Gulf Coast trains. The yard was used for this purpose during two earlier iterations of service on the route, but Amtrak says the track it used previously was removed by CSX in 2019, while Amtrak and the freight railroad were negotiating over the return of Amtrak service. “CSX is now refusing Amtrak’s request to cooperate on a survey of the site for Amtrak to evaluate the potential restoration of the track or determine other optiosn for an interim layover track,” according to the filing.

Amtrak noted it had requested an interim order for access as part of its original filing seeking a ruling that would allow it to launch service on that route [see “Amtrak asks STB to require CSX, NS to allow Gulf Coast service,” Trains News Wire, March 16, 2021]. At the time, the STB declined to issue such an order, noting that Amtrak had received the access it sought and that the parties were “working together to reach a suitable accommodation.”

In its new filing, Amtrak says it “hopes that it will not have to petition the board again to intervene in what should be a cooperative process among the parties.”

In a separate filing, Amtrak asked the board to clarify that the port and its railroad, Terminal Railway Alabama State Docks, are not parties to the Amtrak-CSX-Norfolk Southern dispute and are not entitled to present evidence or an argument without requesting and receiving permission to do so.

The filing notes that the Port filed a letter on Oct. 8 notifying the board of its “intent to present evidence and argument.” But Amtrak argues that the port does not fit the regulatory definition of a party to the proceeding, and has not sought or been granted such status, or to be granted amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) status as an organization with a strong interest in the matter. Amtrak therefore asks that the port not be allowed to further participate without seeking and receiving such status.

The Amtrak plan has met opposition from some Alabama officials, including Gov. Kay Ivie, because of concerns Amtrak service could interfere with traffic to the Port of Mobile. The port authority’s attorney, in that Oct. 8 filing, wrote that the port “is gravely concerned that Amtrak’s proposal would severely imped the flow of railroad freight traffic moving within, to, and from the Port of Mobile,” adversely affecting Mobile’s ability to compete with other ports and “compromising the service reliability of the various railroad carriers” that service the port.

Notably, the Choctaw Yard site Amtrak wishes to use is west of the Mobile station site, which would reduce potential interference with the port, which is east of the station.

3 thoughts on “Amtrak asks STB to compel cooperation by CSX in Gulf Coast case

  1. Millions in tax dollars was spent for CSX track improvements years ago when the Sunset Limited route was extended along the gulf coast. This included bypass tracks and signaling in both Gentily yard in New Orleans and Sibert yard in Mobile. Tracks that CSX still use regularly. Also the idea that rail traffic along the coast will be adversely affected by passenger trains is ridiculous. Traffic volume along the CSX line between Mobile and New Orleans is nowhere near what it was before hurricane Katrina when the Amtrak still plied the coast. A large part of the traffic that was detoured after the storm hasn’t returned leaving plenty of room for passenger trains. In Alabama at least the argument against Amtrak is purely political and nothing else. Alabama is a solid red state and will tow the party line even when not in its citizens best interests.

  2. Greyhound has three trips from New Orleans to Mobile, taking 2h20min to 2h55min. How about transporting connecting pax on the bus? Same station in NOLA.

  3. Alabama “being a solid red state” is not applicable here. History will record that Alabama has hosted 4 Amtrak routes: The Floridian, The Crescent, The Gulf Breeze and The Sunset Limited. Of these it was Amtrak, not the people of Alabama, that terminated three out of four. Amtrak’s track record with Alabama is understandably one of hesitancy.

You must login to submit a comment