News & Reviews News Wire Transit agency to move ahead with Del Mar fence plans

Transit agency to move ahead with Del Mar fence plans

By Trains Staff | January 10, 2022

| Last updated on March 30, 2024

Deadline passes for city of Del Mar to agree to proposal to reduce length, height of safety fence

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

Passenger train next to ocean
A San Diego-bound Amtrak Pacific Surfliner travels along the Del Mar Bluffs in January 2020. The North County Transit District is moving ahead with plans to fence off the track along the bluffs after failing to reach agreement with the city of Del Mar. David Lassen

DEL MAR, Calif. — After lengthy negotiations failed to reach a resolution, the San Diego-area North County Transit District is preparing to move ahead with plans for safety fencing along its railroad right-of-way at the Del Mar Bluffs.

The San Diego Union-Tribune reports the district informed Del Mar officials the fencing would be on the agenda for its Jan. 20 board of directors meeting, and that the options could include a return to the original plan for a 6-foot chain link fence, instead of a lower-profile, less obtrusive design that had been discussed with the city.

Board president Tony Kranz also said in a letter to the Del Mar officials that the board has asked the Surface Transportation Board for “expedited consideration” of its petition to gain sole authority over the fencing and land-stabilization plans for the bluffs. That petition, initially filed in August 2020, has been held in abeyance while the district negotiated with the city and the California Coastal Commission [see “North County Transit District asks STB to delay action …,” Trains News Wire, Nov. 7, 2020].

Eight people have been killed walking on the railroad right-of-way between 2014 and 2020, but city officials and residents have opposed the fencing because they say it will limit their access to the bluffs and adjacent beaches, and also harm views from houses along the tracks. At one point, the Union-Tribune reported the NCTD, city, and coastal commission had agreed to reduce the fence to 4 feet high, use a post-and-cable design instead of the chain link, and cut the length from 12,960 feet to 5,698 feet [see “North County Transit District reaches new agreement …,” News Wire, July 23, 2021].

But Del Mar did not meet a Dec. 31 deadline to agree to those changes, leading to the current NCTD plan to move ahead. Del Mar Mayor Dwight Worden told the newspaper in an email that the city is preparing a response to the NCTD letter and will discuss the fence and related litigation at a meeting today.

The route along the Pacific Coast, owned by the transit district,  is used by Coaster commuter trains, Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner, and BNSF freight traffic.

2 thoughts on “Transit agency to move ahead with Del Mar fence plans

  1. I think this article has a very biased view of all of this. One, the “trespassers” have been crossing this track since it was built back in early 1900’s. It is the only access to the beaches and ocean below for 1.7 miles. Two, NCTD has never negotiated in good faith, beginning with their underhanded petition to the Surface Transportation Board to exclude all local government voice and the California Coastal Commission from having any input to this ruinous plan. Three, they are using a form of extortion, by insisting that a small city like Del Mar assume liability on the tracks (which NCTD owns), which would surely bankrupt the city if things went badly. If Del Mar declines this liability, NCTD plans to punish the local community by sealing off all access and disallowing anyone to walk the trails of this panoramic, pristine natural bluff- one of the very last in southern California.They have not offered any environmental study or geotechnical study to prove that what they are doing (fencing expansively on a very fragile sandstone bluff) is either safe nor environmentally sound. They have shown that they are willing to break State Law in order to get exactly what they want, which is another thirty years of use of this fragile bluff which surely will erode much faster and we will end up with a calamitous bluff failure and the train will end up on the beach, far sooner than their timeline. This bluff is failing faster and faster. Someone needs to wake up here and realize that no amount of armoring of this bluff is going to assure a safe passage for train lines any longer than a few more years…..

You must login to submit a comment