News & Reviews News Wire Plan for rail service to Southern California’s Coachella Valley moves forward

Plan for rail service to Southern California’s Coachella Valley moves forward

By Trains Staff | July 19, 2022

| Last updated on February 23, 2024

Environmental report, service plan approved for estimated $1 billion project

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

Earth-tone passenger station with angled walls
The Amtrak station for Palm Springs, located in Garnet, Calif., could be one stop for a proposed service between Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley. Craig Walker

RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A plan for passenger rail service between Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley — the area including Palm Springs and Indio — has moved forward, with the Riverside County Transportation Commission adopting a service plan for the proposed route.

Patch.com reports the commission has certified the final Tier I environmental impact statement/environmental impact report for the proposed service. A Tier 2 environmental review would still be required before any construction can begin, which could still be 10 years off and cost up to $1 billion.

The website Urbanize Los Angeles reports the planned 144-mile corridor would see two daily round trips between Los Angeles and Coachella. It would make use of an existing Metrolink line and stations in Fullerton and Riverside, but would require significant infrastructure upgrades on Union Pacific’s Yuma Subdivision, including addition of a third main line, a new bridge at the Santa Ana River, and other improvements.

Plans call for up to five new stations in addition to the existing Palm Springs stop used by Amtrak’s Sunset Limited.

5 thoughts on “Plan for rail service to Southern California’s Coachella Valley moves forward

  1. 2 1/2 daily trips, technically. The Sunset Limited runs triweekly on the route too.

    Actually…it looks like the plan is to use BNSF from Union Station south through Fullerton and Riverside, then cut over at Colton to UPRR the rest of the way. I wonder why parallel the Sunset Limited the whole distance? Might just be a capacity issue on UPRR. I don’t think any other Metrolink services use the Sunset Route, though one roughly parallels it, so maybe the cost of upgrades on that part was too great for just those trains.

  2. The justification of all this for two daily round trips (half of whose length will occur on the BNSF, including the Santa Ana River bridge) is that the improvements would benefit future extensions, or new service to Phoenix. This environmental review has to have been going on for about five years. Somewhere around 2015 UP permitted a demonstration train to Palm Springs timed to coincide with music festival. I might live long enough to see it?

You must login to submit a comment