News & Reviews News Wire European rail line caught up in geopolitics stemming from Ukraine war

European rail line caught up in geopolitics stemming from Ukraine war

By Keith Fender | August 2, 2022

Sanctions make route through Lithuania, rail connection to isolated section of Russia, a hot spot

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from brands. Sign-up for email today!

Flat-front European diesel locomotives in yard
Russian Railways twin diesel locomotive 2M62U 0145, in the overall blue colors then used by the Kaliningrad branch of the Russian state railway, prepares to take a train into Kaliningrad from the border station at Kybartai, Lithuania, in 2013. (Keith Fender)

A rail line through the small European country of Lithuania has become the site of serious geopolitical wrangling between the Lithuanian government, the European Union, and Russia. The rail line connects the otherwise isolated small Russian region of Kaliningrad with the rest of Russia, via both Lithuania and Russian ally Belarus.

Financial and other sanctions imposed on Russia since its invasion of Ukraine in February have become more restrictive as the months go by, partly by design, in hopes the harsher penalties might alter the Russian government’s behavior.

Lithuania’s decision in June to fully enforce European sanctions on freight traffic from Russia to Kaliningrad brought a furious response from Moscow, which complained the action breached international law. Russian commentators have hinted at direct action to reopen the traffic lane, but Lithuania is a full member of NATO and any Russian action there could lead to much wider conflict.

Kaliningrad’s complex history

Political map of Europe in Baltic Sea region
A detail of a map of Europe shows Kaliningrad’s location between Poland and Lithuania. (Perry-Casteneda Map Library Collection, University of Texas)

The history of the area is complex even by the complex standards of eastern Europe.  Kaliningrad, as it has been called since 1945, used to be known as Königsberg. It was one of the most important cities in the German Empire in the region known as East Prussia; German Emperors were crowned in its cathedral until World War 1, when Germany became a republic. Despite losing much of its land east of Berlin as Poland was restored to independence in 1918, Königsberg remained part of Germany, albeit separated from the rest of the country, and was a major military and naval base during World War II. On its eastern borders, the newly independent countries of Lithuania and Latvia replaced the Russian Empire after World War I – although only for two decades, as the Soviet Union occupied and annexed them, along with nearby Estonia, in 1940.

Königsberg and its surrounding counties became part of what was then the Soviet Union with the full agreement of the U.S. and British governments at the end of World War II. It was officially made part of Russia and renamed renamed Kaliningrad after a hero of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. With the remaining original German population expelled in 1947, over the next few decades it became a typical Soviet city and a key military base; it is Russia’s only ice-free port on the Baltic Sea in winter.

In the early 1990s, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the re-emergence of independent Lithuania and Latvia, plus the newly independent Belarus, meant Kaliningrad was now an isolated exclave. It was linked to the rest of Russia mainly by rail, but trains had to transit the neighboring independent countries. A train ferry carrying freight cars also operates from Russia to Kaliningrad, although in winter this may not operate for lengthy periods if the ports in Russia are icebound.

Brick railway station in Eastern Europe
Suwałki station in Poland — which gives the strategic area known as the “Suwalki Gap” its name — dates from the 19th century. It is shown in 2012. The station was built when all of eastern Poland was part of the Russian Empire. (Keith Fender)

Before Lithuania and its Baltic neighbors joined the European Union in 2004, new international agreements were drawn up guaranteeing Russian freight and passenger train transit rights. These were signed by the EU as well as Lithuania. The trains travel from Russia into Belarus; cross Lithuania, passing through or near its capital, Vilnius; then head to the border with the Kaliningrad region. The approximately 140-mile rail journey across Lithuania has also been identified by western governments as a major strategic objective if Russia were ever to attack NATO forces. This is known as the “Suwałki Gap,” after the small rail junction town just over the border in Poland, which lies on the 40-mile-wide piece of Polish/Lithuanian territory between Belarus and Kaliningrad.

Steel, cement, alcohol blocked; Russia issues warning

In mid-June, the Lithuanian government started to implement long-agreed EU sanctions for freight traffic heading in or out of Kaliningrad. Initially, this affected only iron and steel, but in early July other goods, including cement and alcohol, were added. The limited nature of the restrictions did not prevent the Russian government’s main spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, from describing Lithuania’s action as a “violation of anything and everything.” Russia called on the EU and Lithuania to change tack, saying they were violating international agreements.

According to Lithuanian government sources, around 2 million tons of foodstuffs annually move from Kaliningrad to the rest of Russia by rail, while many other consumer and industrial products move the other way. Apart from alcohol, these movements are not affected by the current sanctions.

Given western governments’ pre-existing awareness of the strategic importance of the Suwałki Gap, and the relatively minor nature of the freight being carried into Kaliningrad (mostly building materials for use there; trains are inspected to ensure what they carry matches what they are billed as carrying), a fix seemed not only likely, but desirable in the short term, to take the heat out of the argument.

European freight train with diesel locomotives operates under catenary
Lithuanian Railways operate the transit freight trains between the Belarus border and Kaliningrad. Soviet-built, twin-unit diesel 2M62U 0385 rounds a curve at Kaišiadorys, west of Vilnius, in 2012 with a train bound for Kaliningrad. (Keith Fender)

It hasn’t been that simple. Several weeks of discussions between the EU and Lithuania resulted in a compromise, with the EU stating it never had sanctioned traffic within Russia by either road or rail but had restricted such traffic between its members and Russia. This, in theory, would allow rail freight from one part of Russia to Kaliningrad to continue – subject to normal customs and security checks, to ensure that military goods, for example, were not being moved.

However, the Lithuanian government — which has been profoundly shocked by Russia’s aggression in Ukraine — continue to take a harder line . It argues that any assistance to the Russian regime, or its ally Belarus, is counterproductive, so rail and other links should be minimized, not retained as before. Loss of transit traffic and export traffic from Belarus,  mainly potash fertilizer, has hit Lithuanian national rail operator LTG hard, as this traffic previously was a large part of its freight business.

Passenger traffic has continued to operate from Russia to Kaliningrad. The trains stop in Vilnius for locomotive changes or customs examination; Lithuanian authorities decided early in the conflict to post photos of war damage in Ukraine along the platform used by these trains, to be seen by the passengers, who are almost exclusively Russian. Shorter-distance passenger trains between Lithuania and Belarus have been discontinued.

New railway to link Baltic states to western Europe

Map of north-south rail line in Eastern Europe
The route of the Rail Baltica project. (Rail Baltica)

The Suwałki Gap is in the process of gaining strategic importance to the EU, as a new north-south, standard-gauge railway is being built through the area. Known as Rail Baltica, this connects Poland with all three Baltic states. A tunnel linking Estonia to Finland at the northern end has been proposed, although it seems unlikely to be built in the next decade. A major new highway roughly paralleling the rail route is also being built.

Railways in the Baltic states all use 5-foot gauge, so are incompatible with standard gauge used in Poland and nearby EU countries. In addition the lines were historically aligned west to east, to take produce from the Soviet Union to ports for export. The $6 billion Rail Baltica project aims to re-orientate the region’s rail system to become part of the wider existing European rail network. It will improve connections between the countries — no passenger rail passenger service currently connects all of them — and enable traffic currently moving by truck to switch to rail.

The EU has also begun funding infrastructure projects that enhance defence capabilities of its member states and the new railway is certainly one of these. Around $1.5 billion of “military mobility” investment across Europe to get road and rail infrastructure into better shape for use by the military is planned, although this budget was set before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Originally $6.5 billion of work was identified but a much smaller budget was approved.

5 thoughts on “European rail line caught up in geopolitics stemming from Ukraine war

  1. One must also consider what these nations lived through in the past. It is a very complicated situation These nations have all lived through the horrors of Marxist and Nazi occupation. So the actions of Russia do cause a legitimate fear. However, from what I’m reading it’s the creeping of NATO further east that has poked the Russian bear. Not so much that of the European Union. And lets not forget the brutality of the current regime in Belarus.

    1. While I must agree that NATO expansion has “poked the Russian bear,” it was the Russian bear that caused Poland, the Baltic States, Romania, and Bulgaria to seek NATO membership. Russia’s aggression in the Donbas and Crimea certainly accelerated the efforts, and led Georgia and Ukraine to seek safety in NATO, which are unlikely due to a number of reasons outside of current hostilities.
      Nevertheless, it is clear that Europe has the technological and financial wherewithal to build Rail Baltica. All they need is the political wherewithal. In Western Europe, that is probably in short supply.

  2. Great info that most Americans do not know.Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine,the trade between them is nil,and will likely not return.Like Lithuania,Ukraine in the present and future will have more ties to W Europe.Ukraine should change rail gauge to standard gauge from 5′.Than unit grain trains could move west to other European ports without having to change cars due to gauge.Also other products could move by rail in both directions.Maybe ukraine could procure surplus US rail cars and engines.

  3. Lithuania is doing its part to try and light the fuse for WW3. My grandfather’s family roots and cousins live in the area, in Kazlu Ruda. The line into Poland branches off there.

    Lithuania’s revenue from Russian rail transit was $300 million. Lithuania also banned Belarus from exporting potash fertilizer by rail to the Klaipreda port. Supposedly the EU has clarified the sanctions to allow overland transport from Russia to Kaliningrad, but Lithuania, hoping to make a bad situation worse is dragging its feet.

    Rail Baltica is vapor ware are this point. A short standard gauge stub runs from the Polish broder to Kaunas, with infrequent and virtually empty passenger DMUs. I do not believe it is used for freight. Supposedly engineering planning is being done on some of the route. But Via Baltica, a freeway, is already in place and has heavy truck traffic, supplying large warehouses adjacent to the highway. All manner of goods are imported into the Baltics from western Europe as the entire region is a rust belt and has lost 30% of its population since 1991.

    Building a 540 mile railroad for 250 kmh passenger trains for $6 billion seems like a fanciful estimate, doesn’t it? This doesn’t include the 50 km undersea tunnel to Finland. One has to drink strong Kool-aid to see that happening.

    All I can say is it promises to be a long, cold, hungry winter in all of Europe. If Russia cuts of the Baltics from the BRELL transmission grid, it will be terrible suffering. I don’t think any politicians have the wisdom to dial back this needless conflict.

You must login to submit a comment