You have 7 views remaining.

Home / News & Reviews / News Wire / Analysis: Canadian Pacific must go all-in on pursuit of Kansas City Southern

Analysis: Canadian Pacific must go all-in on pursuit of Kansas City Southern

By Bill Stephens | April 21, 2021

A news analysis from Trains columnist Bill Stephens

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories and more.

Map of the combined Canadian Pacific-Kansas City Southern system


Map showing Canadian Naitonal and Kansas City Southern systems
The proposed combination of Canadian National and Kansas City Southern creates a north-south railroad through Jackson, Miss., with a fully stack-cleared route to Eastern Canada via home rails. (Canadian National)


Map of the combined Canadian Pacific-Kansas City Southern system
The proposed combination of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern to create Canadian Pacific Kansas City creates a north-south railroad through Kansas City, Mo. (Canadian Pacific)

Canadian Pacific today finds itself in the same uncomfortable – and threatened – position that Norfolk Southern was in 25 years ago.

Back in October 1996, CSX Transportation utterly shocked NS when it announced it had a deal to acquire Conrail. The $8.1 billion merger would give CSX access to the New York market and in the process relegate NS to the status of an Eastern regional railroad.

Last month in a blockbuster $29 billion deal, CP announced it would acquire Kansas City Southern to create the first railroad linking Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. This would give CP a network that would nearly mirror that of larger rival Canadian National, but with access deep into the major consuming and manufacturing regions of Mexico.

Then along comes CN this week with its stunning and unsolicited $33.7 billion bid for KCS. All of a sudden CP could go from a more potent competitor for CN to an also-ran. CN+KCS would become the third largest Class I railroad in North America, making CP by far the smallest fish in the pond.

What this means, of course, is that the stakes are as high today for CP as they were for NS back in 1996. CP simply cannot let KCS fall into the hands of its larger rival.

Man with shave head wearing eyeglasses and blue open-collared shirt.
Trains Columnist Bill Stephens

NS mounted a “go crazy” bidding and public relations war with CSX, and both railroads ratcheted up the pressure and their offers for Conrail. Surface Transportation Board Chairman Linda Morgan suggested that the railroads reach a deal or risk having one imposed. When the dust settled, NS and CSX agreed to carve up Conrail for $10.3 billion, or 27% more than CSX’s original agreement to swallow Conrail whole.

We’ve yet to fully see what strategy CP CEO Keith Creel & Co. will take regarding CN and KCS. It’s too early for that. But it would seem that this is a make or break deal for CP and that it will have to go all-in to ensure that it winds up with KCS.

In a glimpse of what’s to come, CP on Wednesday warned the STB that it would be forced to find a merger partner if the CN-KCS deal were to come to fruition. And that would likely set off the final wave of railroad consolidation in North America, ultimately leaving us with two go-everywhere systems.

This is the second salvo in CP’s PR war against a CN-KCS deal. On Tuesday CP called CN’s bid “inferior” and “likely to fail,” while ripping CN’s management team for “over promising and underdelivering.”

The second shoe – the bidding war that everyone expects for KCS – is likely to drop soon. CP is outgunned by its larger rival’s ability to finance a KCS deal. But CP undoubtedly will raise its bid.

The questions are when, by how much, and whether it ultimately may need to bring in a partner, such as a private equity firm that might take a stake in the combined company. It was, after all, the interest of two infrastructure funds in taking KCS private last year that sparked the CP-KCS merger talks.

A wildcard in all this is the Kansas City Southern board, which is currently reviewing CN’s offer. Will KCS reject CN’s bid over regulatory concerns? Or will CP be required to match or top CN’s offer?

One thing’s for sure: It will be interesting to watch this battle unfold between fierce rivals CP and CN.

You can reach Bill Stephens at and follow him on twitter @bybillstephens.

8 thoughts on “Analysis: Canadian Pacific must go all-in on pursuit of Kansas City Southern

  1. I wonder if CP waited too long to do this. The time to acquire KCS would have been after CN bought IC.

  2. That’s a very good point.

    The KCS board should go back to CP and say “pay up.” They won’t have much choice.

  3. Reminds me of the time the steel mill I worked at had duelling buyers, deepest pockets won. A few anti trust rules were put in place by the government.
    Same thing could happen here with trackage rights taking place.

  4. Say CN gets KCS. There may be some small concessions to NS or CSX or both to ensure no loss of two shippers for those who have them

    CP then combines end to end with CSX or NS. CP only really overlaps either one of those between Chicago and Detroit and even then only by trackage rights.

    I am not sure how that changes things significantly. How much more traffic would go from Western Canada to the Eastern US compared to what already does, or from Eastern Canada to the Eastern US for that matter?

    Would that really trigger a final consolidation?

  5. I just want to convey a big shout out to Bill Stephens for his past and continuing coverage of freight rail issues. His comparison of CP with CN now and NS with CSX in 1996 is right on target. And I heartily agree with Messers McIntosh and Friedman that CP should have gone after KCS right after CN got permission to swallow IC. This will indeed be one to watch. Grab a bag of popcorn and pull up a chair. And speaking of CSX, let’s not forget about their efforts to acquire PAR.

  6. Unlike the Conrail deal, I don’t see a way to carve up KCS between the two Canadian railroads. One of then has to win it all, and I would say CP has the upper hand, solely because the STB would say the combination with CN would be anticompetitive. I agree with the other commenters that say CP should have bought KCS 20 years ago, but the didn’t, so here we are.

  7. Mr. Winegar is correct on all counts. Winner has to take all and I too believe CP has the stronger case.

  8. this is just the beginning its going to come down to two railroads running north american its going to be either north and south or east and west

You must login to submit a comment