You have 7 views remaining.

Home / News & Reviews / News Wire / Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern deal gains early support

Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern deal gains early support

By Bill Stephens | April 1, 2021

STB receives 259 letters of support from shippers,other entitites

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories and more.

Logos for Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern

Logos for Canadian Pacific and Kansas City SouthernCALGARY, Alberta — Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern have rounded up broad support for their proposed merger, which would create the first railroad to operate in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

The railways announced yesterday that they have received support statements from 259 shippers, other railroads, economic development authorities, and ports.

Shipper sentiment will be important as the $29 billion deal faces review at the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. The shipper support letters were filed with the STB on Wednesday.

The shipper support came from a broad range of railroad customers, including international container lines Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, automaker Hyundai and auto parts suppliers, food companies Kraft and Nestle, forest products companies J.D. Irving and Boise Cascade, several grain producers, chemical and plastics manufacturers, metals shippers, and potash mining companies.

Among the 23 railroads supporting the deal are short line holding companies Watco and Genesee & Wyoming.

Many of the support letters asked the STB to review the CP-KCS merger as quickly as possible, arguing that the end-to-end combination of the two smallest Class I systems will benefit shippers and the economy.

The STB is expected to issue a decision on the merger in the middle of 2022.

The complete list of entities supporting the deal, along with their letters, is available here.


3 thoughts on “Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern deal gains early support

  1. With this merger, I crunch that all the locomotives will be repaint that clotted blood red…I was a KCS stockholder when Haverty got rid of the white and gray elephants…

  2. I think it should go through the more thorough 2001 merger review rules, notwithstanding that CP and KCS only meet in Kansas City and it’s an end to end combination. There’s absolutely no reason the companies can’t compete as stand alone organizations going forward, they’ve been doing it for the last two dozen years as it is.

  3. What is the good for the public and for most shippers out of such a merger? Does it or does it not reduce competition? In this case, I ask not knowing the answer. How much overlap if any is there? What good or harm will this do?

You must login to submit a comment