News & Reviews News Wire BNSF unions threaten strike over attendance policy (updated)

BNSF unions threaten strike over attendance policy (updated)

By Trains Staff | January 13, 2022

| Last updated on March 30, 2024

SMART-TD and BLET unions initiate steps to strike BNSF properties

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from brands. Sign-up for email today!

Logos for BLET, SMART-TD unionsCLEVELAND — Members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and the Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation union, who work for the BNSF Railway, initiated steps to go on strike following the railroad’s announcement of its so-called “Hi-Viz” attendance policy. Collectively, the unions represent more than 17,000 active members at the BNSF.

The unions argue that the pending policy, which BNSF plans to implement Feb. 1, repudiates numerous collectively bargained agreements currently in place throughout the BNSF system. “This unprecedented BNSF policy repudiates direct and clear contract language, and in application, will attempt to force our members to report for duty without regard for their medical condition as we struggle to come out of a pandemic,” BLET National President Dennis Pierce and SMART-TD President Jeremy Ferguson said in a news release.

BNSF’s new Hi-Viz policy is a points-based system which, according to the unions, penalizes employees — who in many cases have no assigned days off — any time they take time off work for practically any reason. In an FAQ that BNSF sent to its employees, the railroad said it “must improve crew availability to remain competitive in the industry” and that their revised Hi-Viz program helps with this issue “by incentivizing consistent and reliable attendance.” BNSF claims that a reduction in absenteeism will improve predictability of work assignments. The unions counter that if the BNSF instead focused efforts on predictable scheduling of assignments and management of its furloughed employees, there would be no need to impose attendance policies.

“It also stands to take away any ability by our members to avoid working fatigued when they are routinely called without warning due to the complete lack of reliable train lineups, thus creating the potential for an even more unsafe railroad operation. So-called ‘forced overtime’ in an industry where safety is so critical not only repudiates our agreements, it stands to enact irreparable harm on hundreds of full-time employees whose nonworkplace obligations prevent them from being at work every day of their life,” the union leaders said.

On Jan. 12, President Pierce and President Ferguson gave permission to their organizations’ respective BNSF General Committees of Adjustment to begin polling their membership regarding a withdrawal from service over the dispute. Under BLET internal law, a majority of the membership at any given railroad, or their Local Chairmen, must vote in favor of a strike and the national president and the general chairmen must approve the date for any withdrawal from service. Under the SMART Constitution, the union’s leadership may authorize a strike after the affected general chairpersons obtain two-thirds majority approval from the local chairpersons under their jurisdiction.

In a statement late Thursday, BNSF said the company “has not changed its attendance guidelines in more than 20 years” but that the new system announced this week “is designed to provide employees with real-time information and greater flexibility, so they can make informed decisions about their work schedules. This policy update is consistent with practices across the transportation industry, while helping us safely and efficiently serve our customers and the communities that count on us. We understand that change can be an adjustment, but working together with our employees, we believe we can adapt to meet today’s competitive freight environment.”

— Updated at 7:38 a.m. on Jan. 14 to include BNSF statement.

9 thoughts on “BNSF unions threaten strike over attendance policy (updated)

  1. CSX unions should have taken the lead on this 3 years ago. We have been on a points system for years, it got worse after CSX lost in arbitration for the original point system. Under the old system a person could stay marked up for 3 months and have points fall off, currently you have to stay marked up from January to June or July to December to have points fall off.
    Hopefully CSX unions see this and follow suit since they blew the chance of being first to challenge the point system.

  2. “We can’t hire people, but we’ll fire you for going to your grandma’s funeral” is a hell of way to run a railroad

  3. Railroads can’t keep thinking like a hundred years ago. They want to worry about attendance when employees want more stability. Doesn’t matter how much the paycheck is anymore people want to enjoy life.

    1. Mark or maybe want a life ! Anything for the company went out the widow years ago. Maybe some of the high paid muck it t mucks should put on a set of bibs for a few months of seven days a week to see what it’s like.

    2. DO NOT blanket statement everyone like that…some of us still just care about the paycheck and the hell with the rest of it. People suck, so why would I want to interact with them. You can still enjoy life, that’s what vacation is for.

  4. “Complete lack of reliable train lineups”. Be careful what you wish for. BNSF is a PSR holdout – for now anyway.

You must login to submit a comment