You have 2 views remaining. Click here to learn about the Unlimited Membership!

Home / News & Reviews / News Wire / Attorneys general oppose Trump administration plan to move LNG by rail NEWSWIRE

Attorneys general oppose Trump administration plan to move LNG by rail NEWSWIRE

By Justin Franz | January 15, 2020

Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from brands. Sign-up for email today!

Trains' Washington Watch logo
WASHINGTON — Attorneys general from 15 states and the District of Columbia have come out against a Trump administration proposal to allow the movement of liquified natural gas by rail.

Last year, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and the Federal Railroad Administration began to seek public comment on the proposal to move LNG in DOT-113 tank cars. Liquified natural gas can currently move by truck, or by rail only in a portable tank, with approval by the FRA

On Jan. 13, a coalition of attorneys general came out against the proposal in comments filed with federal regulators.

“Here in Maryland, we need only remember the Howard Street Tunnel Fire of 2001 to know that sending hazardous materials along our rail lines can have catastrophic consequences,” says Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh.

The 2001 derailment in Baltimore of a 60-car CSX Transportation train sparked a blaze that burned for hours and consumed multiple cargoes including paper, pulp products, hydrochloric acid, and propylene glycol. 

In addition to Maryland, the comment letter was signed by the attorneys general of 14 states and the District of Columbia.

In June 2019, the House of Representatives passed an amendment trying to prohibit the U.S. Department of Transportation from issuing permits to move LNG by rail. The amendment was in response to an executive order that directed the Secretary of Transportation to finalize a rule that would “treat LNG the same as other cryogenic liquids and permit LNG to be transported in approved rail cars.”

In December, PHMSA granted a special permit to Energy Transport Solutions LLC to move LNG in DOT-113 tank cars from Wyalusing, Pa., and Gibbstown, N.J. The move was quickly blasted by U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, who says the decision to issue the permit was “reckless”.

5 thoughts on “Attorneys general oppose Trump administration plan to move LNG by rail NEWSWIRE

  1. Anyone who would prefer road shipment vice rail needs to have hias head examined. That said, reasonable regulation should govern rail movement.

  2. Raymond, the correct term is Attorneys General. It is a legal description for ones who work for States and is the plural form. Just like former US Attorneys General would describe Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch,and Eric Holder.
    Attorney is the noun and general is the modifier. Hence Attorney General is singular and Attorneys General is plural.

  3. The Trains site had some kind of malfunction earlier today and it appears many of the posts made in the prior 48 hours have been lost.

You must login to submit a comment