You have 7 views remaining. Click here to learn about the Unlimited Membership!

Home / News & Reviews / News Wire / Trump’s plan to store nuclear waste in Nevada could revive proposed Yucca Mountain route NEWSWIRE

Trump’s plan to store nuclear waste in Nevada could revive proposed Yucca Mountain route NEWSWIRE

By Justin Franz | April 5, 2017

Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories and more.

A Department of Defense train hauling a spent nuclear fuel cask in an undated photo.
U.S. Department of Energy
WASHINGTON — The resurrection of a controversial plan to store nuclear waste under Nevada’s Yucca Mountain could also mean a revival for a proposed rail line to the remote site.

In late March, the Trump Administration announced it would request $120 million in the upcoming 2018 budget to restart the licensing process for the Yucca Mountain project. While the Department of Energy is staying tight-lipped about the renewed prospects of building a brand-new railroad hundreds of miles across the desert, advocates for the project tell Trains News Wire that it is the most likely scenario should the project move forward.

The government first proposed storing thousands of tons of radioactive waste at the remote mountain in southern Nevada in the 1980s. However, Nevadans of all political backgrounds have been critical of the project and the Obama administration cut funding for it during his two terms.

Since the beginning, rail has been seen as the primary method to move nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain. Through the 1990s and early 2000s, the energy department studied up to five different routes to the site and eventually settled on one that runs 319 miles from the Union Pacific at Caliente, Nev., to Yucca Mountain. In the early 2000s, the federal government estimated that it would cost upwards of $2 billion to construct the mountainous line.

But the Obama administration threw a wrench in that plan in 2015, when it created the 700,000-acre Basin and Range National Monument, which cuts right through the proposed Caliente route.

“I think this is another nail in the coffin of Yucca Mountain,” former energy department official Timothy Frazier told the Las Vegas Review-Journal in 2015.

But with renewed support from the White House, the energy department may soon start looking for other routes to Yucca. In 2015, Gary Lanthrum, former chief transportation official for the project, told the Review-Journal that a shorter route to Yucca through the Walker River Indian Reservation was possible. That route would stretch 209 miles through the desert, northwest of Las Vegas, and part of it would be built on an abandoned Southern Pacific branch line.

What railroad-related work the government is doing right now is unknown. When Trains News Wire reached out to federal officials, they offered a prepared statement from Energy Secretary Rick Perry about the overall project but little else. However, a spokesperson for the Nuclear Energy Institute tells News Wire that it is likely any renewed plan to move large amounts of radioactive waste would include railroads.

“In the United States, we have transported used nuclear fuel by rail safely and efficiently for decades,” says institute representative Jarret Adams. “The vast majority of any used nuclear fuel transported to Yucca Mountain would be moved by rail and this would require a significant addition to rail infrastructure in Nevada.”

Nuclear Energy Institute officials add that between 1979 and 2007, approximately 2,400 metric tons of used nuclear fuel was safely shipped from commercial nuclear plants in the United States.

Department of Energy officials also discussed moving nuclear waste by rail in January at the Transportation Research Board.

8 thoughts on “Trump’s plan to store nuclear waste in Nevada could revive proposed Yucca Mountain route NEWSWIRE

  1. I vote for rebuilding the Carson & Colorado, Tonopah & Goldfield, Tonopah & Tidewater, and Las Vegas & Tonopah!

  2. The nearest rail line is 209 miles away……That must really be the middle of nowhere and a great place to store the waste.

  3. The Federal Government assumed responsibility for the handling and storage of spent nuclear fuel 40 years ago. The plant operators have been paying for the privilege ever since.

  4. It is Jim, and the geology of the mountain itself is very favorable to long-term radioactive storage. It really is the best place for it.

  5. From a geological point of view, not sure that Yucca Mountain is the best location. It sits directly above the Bow ridge line fault and also has other minor faults leading all the way from the proposed storage area to an acquifer running below. It would also be subject to earthquakes. For a location that will host highly radioactive waste for 100000+ years, the odds of an a large-scale release a large amount of radioactive materials through flowing water is somewhat high. Other locations that are less geologically active (such as the Canadian Shield) may be more suitable.

    I am not at all against the use of nuclear energy in the future, but it is a pity that we are still unable to harvest further energy from this waste using fast-neutron breeder reactors. And other, safer alternatives, such as thorium reactors, exist as well. These options would make the proposed storage area obsolete, as fast-neutron reactor waste is 90% less radioactive than the current technology based on military use and dates back to the 1950’s.

  6. I have been to Yucca Mtn (part of the Nevada Test Site) as a trucker and it is probably not more than 35 miles off US 95—there is abandoned RR right of way starting at Ludlow CA on the BNSF thru the desert near Baker CA crossing the UP line that runs from Barstow to Salt Lake City and continuing to the Death Valley –the old right of way is quite visible with old ties and culverts along the highway route which would give access from 2 different major rail lines. Noone complained when testing was conducted there in the 50’s and 60’s and thousands of people commuted to work there.

  7. I am somewhat confused where these great railway distances came from. It seems that a direct line from Las Vegas to Yucca Mountain would be about 120 km. The Las Vegas and Tonopah Railroad was about 180 km to Beatty. I would guess that $1 million/km should be sufficient to construct a RR in the area.

You must login to submit a comment