News & Reviews News Wire CSX won’t rule out merger options

CSX won’t rule out merger options

By Bill Stephens | July 23, 2025

But CEO Joe Hinrichs says the railroad remains confident in its own plans to improve service, move more freight, and boost profits

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

CSX’s New York Central heritage locomotive basks in the sun outside the railroad’s Waycross, Ga., paint shop. CSX

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — CSX may not be out shopping for a merger partner, but the railroad will consider proposals that would raise shareholder value, improve service, and lead to profitable growth.

“We know there’s been a lot of rumor and speculation about consolidation in the railroad industry in recent weeks,” CSX CEO Joe Hinrichs said on the company’s earnings call today. “While we cannot comment, we want to be clear that at CSX we are absolutely focused on delivering shareholder value and are always open to anything that can help us achieve this objective.”

Man in white polo shirt speaking in front of CSX backdrop
CSX CEO Joe Hinrichs speaks during the company’s investor day on Thursday, Nov. 7, 2024. Screenshot from CSX webcast

In prepared remarks and subsequent comments on the earnings call, Hinrichs did not directly address any specific merger scenarios. But he returned to the theme of openness to possibilities that could help CSX grow profitably, serve customers better, and compete more effectively with trucks.

Among them: Working more closely with other railroads to improve service and make it easier for customers to do business with railroads. “We think there are all kinds of opportunities to work together to make it better for our customers and we’re open to talking about all those possibilities,” he says.

The comments come amid heightened interest in industry consolidation following recent media reports that Union Pacific is in merger talks with CSX’s Eastern rival, Norfolk Southern.

Hinrichs emphasized that CSX’s current strategy is rooted in strengthening its existing network.

“We have a strong franchise that we believe is the best in the East, and we are making it stronger every day,” he said, pointing to industry-leading customer service metrics, expanding industrial development partnerships, and ongoing capacity projects such as the clearance work in the Howard Street Tunnel in Baltimore.

At the core of CSX’s strategy, Hinrichs says, is the belief that improved service and easier customer interactions are the keys to long-term rail growth.

“Our thesis all along has been that improved customer service and making it easier to do business with railroads are paramount,” he says. “There are opportunities … to work together with the entire rail ecosystem to improve that.”

Hinrichs, who was an auto industry executive for more than three decades before coming to CSX in 2022, has frequently said that he has been puzzled about why railroads don’t work more closely together to improve their interline service.

While reiterating that CSX would not speculate publicly on mergers, Hinrichs says that management and the board would be open to various options.

“While we are confident in the CSX path forward, we welcome all opportunities that would allow us to deliver value for our shareholders, drive profitable growth, and serve customers better,” he says. “We actively evaluate these opportunities for their upside potential.”

8 thoughts on “CSX won’t rule out merger options

  1. CSX’s NYC heritage locomotive #1853 looks absolutely stunning in the article photo…

    Dr. Güntürk Üstün

  2. UP and CSX connect at their eastern/western endpoints – New Orleans, Memphis, St. Louis, and Chicago. No overlap. BNSF and NS do have a bit of an overlap, but it’s a shared mainline from Kansas City to Carrollton, MO, where they part ways to go to Chicago and St. Louis respectivefully. Otherwise no very duplicative routes, just what appears to be two balanced, competitive systems – what was wanted back east.

  3. UP may be looking to acquire CSX or NS (Remember that CSX competes with NS).

    Dr. Güntürk Üstün

  4. Once again we have railroads seeking the wrong merger partners. In the late 1950s/early 1960s, New York Central (NYC) and Baltimore and Ohio (B&O) wanted a merger deal with the Chesapeake and Ohio. Both NYC and B&O needed C&O’s wealth i.e. the coal franchise. Chessie determined that it could only rescue one road and picked B&O (NYC President Al Perlman’s personality and NYC’s finances didn’t help matters). Stuart Saunders, Chairman of big and poor Pennsylvania, wanted to keep/absorb his rich former employer, Pennsy-controlled) Norfolk and Western, to fund PRR’s future diversification program. Instead N&W cut a deal with Wabash and Nickel Plate, and the rest as they is history.

    1. Nevertheless, we now have NYC/C&O/B&O/SBD vs. PRR/N&W/WAB/NKP/SOU as potential brides for rival suitors UP and BNSF. That UP and NS are canoodling is no guarantee that they will end up together. UP is rich but BNSF’s parents are far richer.

You must login to submit a comment