News & Reviews News Wire Amtrak’s Borealis marks first anniversary, sparking dramatic boost to Chicago-St. Paul ridership

Amtrak’s Borealis marks first anniversary, sparking dramatic boost to Chicago-St. Paul ridership

By Trains Staff | May 21, 2025

State-supported train has increased ridership by more than 200%, along with Empire Builder service

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

Passenger train on curve
The eastbound Borealis passes through Brookfield, Wis., on April 22, 2025. The train has been running with Superliner equipment since Amtrak’s Horizon cars were sidelined in late March. David Lassen

CHICAGO — Amtrak says ridership on the St. Paul-Chicago route is up 227% since the introduction of the Borealis, which made its debut one year ago today, on May 21, 2024.

Preliminary figures through the first 11 months of service show more than 205,800 riders on the Borealis, funded by the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois, and more than 293,000 on the route when including Empire Builder passengers.

“Amtrak is proud to celebrate a successful first year of the Borealis — and it’s only going to improve next year and beyond,” company president Roger Harris said in a press release. “Thanks to strong collaboration with our partners, we have exceeded expectations and provided a reliable, efficient, and safe way to travel between the Twin Cities and Chicago via Milwaukee.”

Officials in the three states also celebrated the year-old train’s strong ridership. Minnesota Transportation Commissioner Nancy Daubenberger said “the service has exceeded so many of our expectations, with ridership surpassing projections,” while Wisconsin Transportation Secretary Kristina Boardman said the train has “become a resounding success story and the ridership data reflects that. Said acting Illinois Transportation Secretary Gia Biagi, “The demand for convenient, reliable passenger rail in Illinois always has been strong, but the early success of the Borealis line shows that appetite extends beyond our borders and throughout the Midwest.”

Biagi also said Illinois looks forward to “working with our partner states on ways to strengthen service in the years ahead and explore future opportunities to offer more travel options for our residents and visitors.”

Borealis ridership has been strong from the start [see “Amtrak’s Borealis hits 100,000-passenger mark …,” Trains News Wire, Oct. 25, 2025]. Its early success sparked discussion of adding another train on the route, with Wisconsin beginning a study of that possibility late last year thanks to Federal Railroad Administration Corridor ID funding [see “Wisconsin begins study …,” News Wire, Nov. 29, 2024].

11 thoughts on “Amtrak’s Borealis marks first anniversary, sparking dramatic boost to Chicago-St. Paul ridership

  1. forecast first year 155k actual 212k. How could number of riders be so under forecast? 157% of forecast. However, does this number include the local riders MKE CHI ? If so was it included om the forecast. This route is showing signs of a smaller example of Brightline potential riders.

    How are the route improvements progressing?

    1. Jow much capacity constraint has there been? Especially with the Horizon fiasco.

  2. The real money loser is the highways! When was the last time they paid their way?The HTF went bankrupt in 2008, since then they (Congress) has siphoned over $150 BILLION from the Treasury to make up for the lost revenue due to not raising the gas tax with inflation & the endless expansion of roads & hwys, not to mention the billions of dollars subsidizing the trucking industry by not raising their annual Hwy Use Tax Don’t talk about passenger rail being profitable when hwys are adding billions of dollars to the deficit every year.

    1. Galen —- I (for one, speaking for myself) do NOT talk about rail passenger profitability. I favor subsidizing passenger rail and local transit. I’m with you that the other modes (highway, aviation) should pay their own way out of user fees or tickets.

      Where I part with you is your anti-highway policy. Highways carry a whole lot of traffic. Improved highways do it safer. Many years ago, NARP’s CEO Ross Capon published some anti-highway remarks. I sent him a letter saying that I had just read a Wisconsin DOT highway crash report, which included the entry on the form “Deputy Notifies Family”. In my letter, I said to Ross that improved highways save lives. Graciously, Ross wrote back thanking me for my input.

      A moderately busy Interstate Highway carries 100K vehicles per day. That’s more vehicles per day than Amtrak carries passengers per day nationwide and into Canada.

      Most Americans do not ride Amtrak. Take Amtrak’s annual ridership, assume that most riders ride several (or many) times per year (at the very least, a round trip), to calculate the number of separate individuals. That’s a drop in the bucket compared to the population.

      I talk to people about my recent train trips – METRA, Amtrak Hiawatha, Borealis, and Cascade, MBTA Providence Line, Denver A-Train, Seattle light rail. Or maybe my lifetime train trips all over America and in three other countries, such as having been a regular commuter on the MBTA Red Line, long ago, or riding NYCTA all over the city when I was a college student. In response, the people I talk to might say they have ridden a train a couple of times in their entire life.

    2. As one may recall, many European countries (France, Germany, Spain, Italy, etc.) are good examples of the harmonious combination of highways and railroads in passenger transport… Unfortunately, such a situation is not yet the case in North America.

      Dr. Güntürk Üstün

  3. Nice, but at what cost? Originally they were to run with 1 unit and turn it at MSP. That didn’t work out so they are running 2 units …. read increased fuel expense and the expenses with running a second one. ( Why are both units running for a 3 car train when one could be shut down saving fuel? ) .

    Unfortunately, another money loser, as nice as it is. Wonder if there are any current financial statistics available?

    https://tcbmag.com/is-the-amtrak-borealis-train-really-profitable/

    1. It’s been rather clear from May 1, 1971 that Amtrak needs crash-worthy cab cars. with passenger seats.

  4. This gives evidence that reliable medium length service can be successful Build conventional service to establish a base. Then add from that. This is opposite from the California HSR project.

    1. As someone who lives within walking distance of the photo I’m rather proud not to be a Californian and very happy to be counted among the most strident opponents of CalHSR.

      Last winter’s service interruption of the Boring Alice was a nasty blow —– aside from that, Ms. Boring Alice is the very avatar of what Amtrak needs to do, and how to accomplish it. Plus for the railfans in us, one heckuva nice train ride!

  5. Flying between CHI and MSTP is a royal PITA. I hope this route continues to grow and get increased speeds.

    1. Amtrak’s Borealis provides comfortable and affordable travel to wonderful places. It’s great to see so many people taking advantage of this service. Let’s hope it continues to improve. One should always recall that putting a new passenger train into service is much more troublesome than cancelling it.

      Dr. Güntürk Üstün

You must login to submit a comment