Santa Cruz County transit agency opts to seek intercity rail service on proposed 22-mile line

Santa Cruz County transit agency opts to seek intercity rail service on proposed 22-mile line

By Trains Staff | March 22, 2025

| Last updated on August 6, 2025


Regional Transportation Commission balks at estimate of $980 million for bridge replacement, repairs

Map of proposal rail line between Santa Cruz and Pajaro, Calif.
Route of the proposed passenger rail operation in Santa Cruz County, Calif. Officials have opted to support an intercity rail service rather than light rail. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission

WATSONVILLE, Calif. — The Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission has approved pursuing intercity rail service between Santa Cruz and Pajaro, Calif., rather than a light-rail alternative, while asking its staff to find an alternative to bridge repairs or replacement on that route that could cost almost $1 billion.

The news site Santa Cruz Local reports that at a March 20 meeting in Watsonville, the commission voted 9-1 to establish its preference for intercity rail service, which would offer a faster trip with fewer stops than light rail. That choice aligns with the California state rail plan [see “California rail plan calls for $310 billion program …,” Trains News Wire, Jan. 8, 2025], and is considered more likely to qualify for state and federal funding. It could also eliminate the need to string catenary along the 22-mile route.

However, the commission was not willing to accept the estimate of a consulting firm that all 33 bridges on route would need to be replaced or strengthened, at a cost of $980 million [see “Santa Cruz rail project could require …,” News Wire, March 15, 2025]. The commission staff had previously recommended replacement of 23 bridges, including 16 wooden structures.

“I don’t believe that there can’t be alternatives that would have less of a cost,” said Andy Schiffrin, representing commission member Justin Cummings, a county supervisor.“What I’m asking for is just taking another look.” But the commission’s executive director, Sarah Christensen, said replacing fewer bridges might save money initially while increasing long-term maintenance costs.

Share this article